Logic Proof Calculator With Steps

Logic Proof Calculator with Steps

Verify and Construct Logical Arguments with Precision

Logic Proof Input

Premises (one per line, e.g., P -> Q, P):

</div>
</p></div>
<div class="input-group">
                <label for="conclusion">Conclusion (e.g., Q):</label><br />
                <input type="text" id="conclusion" placeholder="Enter the conclusion to prove."></p>
<div class="error-message" id="conclusionError"></div>
</p></div>
<div class="button-group">
                <button type="button" onclick="calculateLogicProof()">Verify Proof</button><br />
                <button type="button" id="resetBtn" onclick="resetCalculator()">Reset</button><br />
                <button type="button" id="copyBtn" onclick="copyResults()">Copy Results</button>
            </div>
</section>
<section class="calc-section">
<div id="results">
<h3>Proof Verification Results</h3>
<div id="mainResult" class="main-result">—</div>
<div class="intermediate-values">
<p>Intermediate Values:</p>
<p id="numPremises">Number of Premises: <span>0</span></p>
<p id="conclusionComplexity">Conclusion Complexity: <span>N/A</span></p>
<p id="inferenceSteps">Inferred Steps: <span>0</span></p>
</p></div>
<p class="formula-explanation">
                    This calculator analyzes the provided premises and conclusion. It attempts to construct a formal proof using common inference rules (like Modus Ponens, Modus Tollens, Hypothetical Syllogism, etc.) to demonstrate if the conclusion logically follows from the premises. The primary result indicates whether a valid proof was found.
                </p>
<div id="assumptions" style="margin-top: 15px; display: none;">
<p>Key Assumptions/Rules Used:</p>
<p id="rulesUsed"><span>N/A</span></p>
</p></div>
</p></div>
</section>
<section class="calc-section">
<h2>Proof Visualization</h2>
<div class="table-responsive-wrapper">
<table id="proofTable">
<caption class="table-caption">Step-by-Step Proof Construction</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Step</th>
<th>Statement</th>
<th>Justification / Inference Rule</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
                        <br />
                    </tbody>
</table></div>
<div class="chart-responsive-wrapper">
                <canvas id="proofChart"></canvas></p>
<div class="chart-caption">Proof Complexity Over Steps</div>
</p></div>
</section>
<section class="article-content">
<h2>What is a Logic Proof Calculator with Steps?</h2>
<p>{primary_keyword} is a specialized tool designed to help users verify the validity of logical arguments and construct formal proofs step-by-step. In formal logic, a proof is a sequence of statements, each of which is either a premise or is derived from previous statements using accepted rules of inference, ultimately leading to a conclusion. This calculator automates the process of checking if a conclusion necessarily follows from a set of given premises.</p>
<p><strong>Who Should Use It?</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Students of Logic and Philosophy:</strong> Essential for understanding and practicing deductive reasoning, propositional logic, and predicate logic.</li>
<li><strong>Computer Scientists:</strong> Crucial for areas like formal verification, automated theorem proving, and algorithm correctness.</li>
<li><strong>Mathematicians:</strong> To rigorously establish mathematical theorems and propositions.</li>
<li><strong>Anyone Interested in Critical Thinking:</strong> To develop a stronger grasp of sound reasoning and argumentation.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Common Misconceptions:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>That it replaces human understanding:</strong> While it automates verification, the choice of inference rules and the strategic construction of proofs still require logical insight.</li>
<li><strong>That all valid arguments are sound:</strong> A proof demonstrates validity (if premises are true, conclusion must be true), not soundness (which also requires premises to be factually true). This calculator focuses on validity.</li>
<li><strong>That it can handle informal arguments:</strong> This tool works with formal logical statements, not everyday language arguments which can be ambiguous.</li>
</ul>
<h2>Logic Proof Calculator Formula and Mathematical Explanation</h2>
<p>The core of a {primary_keyword} lies in simulating the application of formal inference rules. While there isn’t a single ‘formula’ like in numerical calculators, the process involves a set of algorithms that attempt to derive the conclusion from the premises. This often involves:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>Parsing Input:</strong> Converting the user’s premises and conclusion into an internal, machine-readable format. This involves identifying propositional variables (like P, Q), logical connectives (AND, OR, NOT, IMPLIES), quantifiers (FOR ALL, EXISTS), and logical operators.</li>
<li><strong>Applying Inference Rules:</strong> Systematically attempting to apply a repertoire of valid inference rules to the current set of derived statements (initially the premises). Common rules include:
<ul>
<li><strong>Modus Ponens (MP):</strong> If you have P and P -> Q, you can infer Q.</li>
<li><strong>Modus Tollens (MT):</strong> If you have ~Q and P -> Q, you can infer ~P.</li>
<li><strong>Hypothetical Syllogism (HS):</strong> If you have P -> Q and Q -> R, you can infer P -> R.</li>
<li><strong>Disjunctive Syllogism (DS):</strong> If you have P | Q and ~P, you can infer Q.</li>
<li><strong>Simplification (Simp):</strong> If you have P & Q, you can infer P (and also Q).</li>
<li><strong>Conjunction (Conj):</strong> If you have P and Q, you can infer P & Q.</li>
<li><strong>Universal Instantiation (UI):</strong> From a statement about all items (e.g., V x (Px -> Qx)), you can infer a specific instance (e.g., Pa -> Qa).</li>
<li><strong>Existential Generalization (EG):</strong> If you have a specific statement (e.g., Pa), you can infer a quantified statement (e.g., E x Px).</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li><strong>Proof Search Strategy:</strong> Employing a strategy to guide the application of rules. This could be forward chaining (starting from premises and working towards the conclusion) or backward chaining (starting from the conclusion and working back to the premises). More advanced calculators might use tableaux methods or resolution.</li>
<li><strong>Termination Condition:</strong> The process stops when either the conclusion is derived (proof successful), or when no new statements can be derived, and the conclusion hasn’t been reached (proof failed).</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>Variable Explanations:</strong></p>
<div class="table-responsive-wrapper">
<table class="variables-table">
<caption class="table-caption">Logic Proof Variables</caption>
<thead>
<tr>
<th>Variable</th>
<th>Meaning</th>
<th>Unit</th>
<th>Typical Range</th>
</tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>Premises</td>
<td>Stated facts or assumptions assumed to be true.</td>
<td>Logical Statements</td>
<td>1 or more</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Conclusion</td>
<td>The statement to be proven true based on the premises.</td>
<td>Logical Statement</td>
<td>1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Inference Rules</td>
<td>Valid methods for deriving new statements from existing ones.</td>
<td>Rule Name (e.g., MP, MT)</td>
<td>Finite set of standard rules</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Proof Steps</td>
<td>Individual lines in a formal proof, showing a derived statement and its justification.</td>
<td>Integer</td>
<td>0 to potentially very large</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Logical Connectives</td>
<td>Symbols representing logical operations (AND, OR, NOT, IMPLIES, etc.).</td>
<td>Symbol</td>
<td>~, &, |, ->, <-></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Propositional Variables</td>
<td>Symbols representing basic propositions (e.g., P, Q).</td>
<td>Symbol</td>
<td>Alphabetical characters</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Quantifiers</td>
<td>Symbols representing universal (for all) or existential (there exists) claims.</td>
<td>Symbol</td>
<td>V, E</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table></div>
<h2>Practical Examples (Real-World Use Cases)</h2>
<h3>Example 1: Simple Propositional Logic</h3>
<p><strong>Scenario:</strong> If it is raining (R), then the ground is wet (W). It is raining (R). What can we conclude?</p>
<p><strong>Inputs:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Premises: <code>R -> W</code>, <code>R</code></li>
<li>Conclusion: <code>W</code></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Calculator Output:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Main Result: Valid Proof Found!</li>
<li>Intermediate Values: Number of Premises: 2, Conclusion Complexity: Simple Proposition, Inferred Steps: 2</li>
<li>Rules Used: Modus Ponens (MP)</li>
<li>Proof Table:
<ol>
<li>R -> W (Premise)</li>
<li>R (Premise)</li>
<li>W (From 1, 2 by MP)</li>
</ol>
</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Interpretation:</strong> The calculator confirms that the conclusion ‘W’ (The ground is wet) logically and necessarily follows from the given premises using the Modus Ponens rule.</p>
<h3>Example 2: Slightly More Complex Argument</h3>
<p><strong>Scenario:</strong> If I study (S), I will pass the exam (P). If I pass the exam (P), I will graduate (G). I did not graduate (~G). What can we conclude about studying?</p>
<p><strong>Inputs:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Premises: <code>S -> P</code>, <code>P -> G</code>, <code>~G</code></li>
<li>Conclusion: <code>~S</code></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Calculator Output:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Main Result: Valid Proof Found!</li>
<li>Intermediate Values: Number of Premises: 3, Conclusion Complexity: Negated Proposition, Inferred Steps: 3</li>
<li>Rules Used: Hypothetical Syllogism (HS), Modus Tollens (MT)</li>
<li>Proof Table:
<ol>
<li>S -> P (Premise)</li>
<li>P -> G (Premise)</li>
<li>~G (Premise)</li>
<li>S -> G (From 1, 2 by HS)</li>
<li>~S (From 3, 4 by MT)</li>
</ol>
</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Interpretation:</strong> The calculator shows that if the premises are true, then the conclusion ‘ ~S ‘ (I did not study) must also be true. This demonstrates the logical implications of the given conditions.</p>
<h2>How to Use This Logic Proof Calculator with Steps</h2>
<ol>
<li><strong>Enter Premises:</strong> In the ‘Premises’ text area, type each premise on a separate line. Use standard logical notation (e.g., P, Q, R for propositions; `->` for implication; `&` for AND; `|` for OR; `~` for NOT; `V` for FOR ALL; `E` for EXISTS).</li>
<li><strong>Enter Conclusion:</strong> In the ‘Conclusion’ field, type the specific statement you want to prove based on the premises.</li>
<li><strong>Verify Proof:</strong> Click the ‘Verify Proof’ button.</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>How to Read Results:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Main Result:</strong> This will state “Valid Proof Found!” if the calculator successfully derived the conclusion from the premises, or “Proof Failed.” if it could not.</li>
<li><strong>Intermediate Values:</strong> These provide insights into the structure of the argument, such as the number of initial premises and the complexity of the conclusion.</li>
<li><strong>Rules Used:</strong> Lists the key inference rules applied during the proof construction.</li>
<li><strong>Step-by-Step Proof Table:</strong> This is the core output, showing each line of the formal proof. Each line includes the statement derived and the justification (either a premise number or the inference rule used with the line numbers it references).</li>
<li><strong>Proof Complexity Chart:</strong> Visualizes how the complexity (number of logical connectives or variables) of statements in the proof evolves over the steps.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Decision-Making Guidance:</strong> If the calculator indicates a valid proof, you can be confident that, assuming the premises are true, the conclusion must also be true. If the proof fails, it suggests that the conclusion does not logically follow from the premises as stated, or that a more complex proof strategy might be needed (which this calculator may not employ).</p>
<h2>Key Factors That Affect Logic Proof Results</h2>
<ol>
<li><strong>Correctness of Premises:</strong> The validity of the proof is guaranteed, but its real-world applicability (soundness) depends entirely on whether the premises accurately reflect reality.</li>
<li><strong>Completeness of Inference Rules:</strong> The calculator’s ability to find a proof depends on the set of inference rules it implements. Standard logic systems have many rules, and some proofs require less common ones or a specific sequence.</li>
<li><strong>Notation Accuracy:</strong> Errors in the input notation (e.g., typos, incorrect symbols) will lead to parsing errors or incorrect verification. Ensure adherence to logical syntax.</li>
<li><strong>Complexity of the Argument:</strong> Very long or intricate arguments involving nested quantifiers, complex disjunctions, and conditional statements can be computationally intensive and may challenge simpler proof algorithms.</li>
<li><strong>Formal vs. Informal Logic:</strong> This tool is for formal logic. Arguments in natural language, which rely on context, nuance, and unstated assumptions, cannot be directly verified by such calculators.</li>
<li><strong>Scope of Logic System:</strong> This calculator might be designed for propositional logic, first-order logic, or modal logic. The specific system dictates the available symbols and inference rules. This calculator primarily supports propositional logic with basic quantifier handling.</li>
<li><strong>Proof Search Algorithm:</strong> The efficiency and completeness of the algorithm used to search for a proof significantly impact whether a proof is found, especially for complex cases. Forward chaining might miss proofs findable by backward chaining, and vice-versa.</li>
</ol>
<h2>Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)</h2>
<div class="faq-item">
<h3 onclick="toggleFaq(this)">Q1: What’s the difference between validity and soundness in logic?</h3>
<div class="answer">
                    A: Validity means that IF the premises are true, THEN the conclusion MUST be true. Soundness means the argument is valid AND all its premises are actually true in the real world. This calculator primarily checks for validity.
                </div>
</p></div>
<div class="faq-item">
<h3 onclick="toggleFaq(this)">Q2: Can this calculator prove mathematical theorems?</h3>
<div class="answer">
                    A: Yes, if the theorem and its supporting axioms/lemmas can be expressed in formal logic notation. It’s a tool for deductive reasoning, which underpins mathematics. However, complex mathematical proofs often require specialized theorem provers.
                </div>
</p></div>
<div class="faq-item">
<h3 onclick="toggleFaq(this)">Q3: What logical notation does the calculator accept?</h3>
<div class="answer">
                    A: It generally accepts standard symbols like `~` (NOT), `&` (AND), `|` (OR), `->` (IMPLIES), `<->` (IF AND ONLY IF), `V` (FOR ALL), `E` (EXISTS). Propositional variables are typically uppercase letters (P, Q, R). Check the input placeholders for specifics.
                </div>
</p></div>
<div class="faq-item">
<h3 onclick="toggleFaq(this)">Q4: What happens if my conclusion is false, but the premises are true?</h3>
<div class="answer">
                    A: If the premises are true and the conclusion is false, the calculator should indicate “Proof Failed.”, demonstrating the argument is invalid. If it incorrectly says “Valid Proof Found!”, there might be an error in the calculator’s logic or your input interpretation.
                </div>
</p></div>
<div class="faq-item">
<h3 onclick="toggleFaq(this)">Q5: Can it handle arguments with contradictions?</h3>
<div class="answer">
                    A: Yes. If the premises lead to a contradiction (e.g., P and ~P), then technically any conclusion can be derived (principle of explosion). The calculator might show a proof path or indicate the contradiction depending on its implementation. Showing “Proof Failed.” is also possible if it doesn’t reach the specific conclusion before exhausting options.
                </div>
</p></div>
<div class="faq-item">
<h3 onclick="toggleFaq(this)">Q6: How does the calculator’s chart work?</h3>
<div class="answer">
                    A: The chart typically visualizes the “complexity” or “length” of the statements involved in the proof as it progresses. For instance, it might plot the number of logical connectives or variables against the step number, showing how the argument builds.
                </div>
</p></div>
<div class="faq-item">
<h3 onclick="toggleFaq(this)">Q7: What if the calculator finds multiple ways to prove the conclusion?</h3>
<div class="answer">
                    A: This calculator aims to find *a* valid proof, not necessarily all possible proofs or the shortest one. It might present just one successful derivation path. Different proof strategies can yield different sequences of steps.
                </div>
</p></div>
<div class="faq-item">
<h3 onclick="toggleFaq(this)">Q8: Is this calculator suitable for advanced logic topics like modal or temporal logic?</h3>
<div class="answer">
                    A: Typically, basic logic proof calculators focus on propositional and first-order logic. Advanced systems require specialized notations and inference rules (e.g., Kripke semantics for modal logic) and usually need different, more complex tools. This calculator supports foundational logic.
                </div>
</p></div>
<h2>Related Tools and Internal Resources</h2>
<div class="related-links">
<ul>
<li><a href="/tools/truth-table-generator">Truth Table Generator</a><span>Generate truth tables to visually verify logical equivalences and tautologies.</span></li>
<li><a href="/learn/propositional-logic-basics">Propositional Logic Basics</a><span>Understand the fundamental building blocks of logic: propositions, connectives, and truth values.</span></li>
<li><a href="/learn/predicate-logic-introduction">Introduction to Predicate Logic</a><span>Explore quantifiers, variables, and predicates, extending the power of logical reasoning.</span></li>
<li><a href="/blog/formal-verification-in-software-engineering">Formal Verification in Software Engineering</a><span>Learn how logic proofs are applied to ensure the correctness of software systems.</span></li>
<li><a href="/tools/set-theory-calculator">Set Theory Calculator</a><span>Explore relationships between sets using operations like union, intersection, and complement.</span></li>
<li><a href="/guides/critical-thinking-fallacies">Guide to Common Logical Fallacies</a><span>Identify flawed reasoning patterns to improve your own arguments and analyze others’.</span></li>
</ul></div>
</section>
<p>    </main></p>
<footer>
<div class="container" style="text-align: center; padding: 20px; color: #666; font-size: 0.9em;">
            © 2023 Your Logic Tools Inc. All rights reserved.
        </div>
</footer>
<p>    <script>
        // --- Calculator Logic ---
        var premiseLines = [];
        var conclusionStatement = '';
        var logicTableBody = null;
        var proofSteps = [];
        var chartInstance = null;
        var chartData = { labels: [], datasets: [] };</p>
<p>        function isValidLogicalSymbol(char) {
            return /[a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(char) || ['~', '&', '|', '>', '<', '(', ')', 'V', 'E'].includes(char);
        }

var maxSteps = premiseLines.length + 100; // Limit steps to prevent infinite loops
            var proofFound = false;
            var currentStepCount = premiseLines.length;

while (currentStepCount < maxSteps) {
                currentStepCount++;
                var targetFound = false;
                for(var k=0; k<currentStatements.length; k++) {
                    if(currentStatements[k] === conclusionStatement) {
                        targetFound = true;
                        break;
                    }
                }
                if (targetFound) {
                    proofFound = true;
                    break;
                }
                
                var nextStep = findProofStep(currentStatements, conclusionStatement);

if (nextStep) {
                    // Check if the derived statement is already present
                    var alreadyDerived = false;
                    for(var l=0; l<currentStatements.length; l++) {
                        if(currentStatements[l] === nextStep.statement) {
                            alreadyDerived = true;
                            break;
                        }
                    }

if (!alreadyDerived) {
                        currentStatements.push(nextStep.statement);
                        proofSteps.push({ statement: nextStep.statement, rule: nextStep.rule, premiseLines: nextStep.premiseLines });
                        addProofRow(currentStepCount, nextStep.statement, nextStep.rule + " (" + nextStep.premiseLines.join(', ') + ")");
                        
                        var derivedParsed = parseStatement(nextStep.statement);
                        usedRules.add(nextStep.rule);

chartData.labels.push("Step " + currentStepCount);
                        chartData.datasets[0].data.push(derivedParsed.complexity); // Assuming one dataset for complexity
                    } else {
                        // Statement already derived, try to find another path or stop
                         // This part needs more sophisticated backtracking or search strategy
                         break; // Simple break if we hit a duplicate for now
                    }
                } else {
                    // Cannot derive conclusion with current rules/statements
                    break;
                }
            }

inferenceStepsSpan.textContent = currentStepCount - premiseLines.length;
            if (usedRules.size > 0) {
                 rulesUsedSpan.textContent = Array.from(usedRules).join(', ');
                 assumptionsDiv.style.display = 'block';
            }</p>
<p>            if (proofFound) {
                mainResultDiv.textContent = "Valid Proof Found!";
                mainResultDiv.style.backgroundColor = "var(--success-color)";
            } else {
                mainResultDiv.textContent = "Proof Failed.";
                mainResultDiv.style.backgroundColor = "#dc3545"; // Red for error
            }</p>
<p>            updateChart();
        }</p>
<p>        function addProofRow(stepNum, statement, justification) {
            var row = logicTableBody.insertRow();
            var cellStep = row.insertCell(0);
            var cellStatement = row.insertCell(1);
            var cellJustification = row.insertCell(2);</p>
<p>            cellStep.textContent = stepNum;
            cellStatement.textContent = statement;
            cellJustification.textContent = justification;
        }</p>
<p>        function resetCalculator() {
            document.getElementById("premises").value = "P -> Q\nP";
            document.getElementById("conclusion").value = "Q";
            document.getElementById("mainResult").textContent = "---";
            document.getElementById("mainResult").style.backgroundColor = "#e9ecef";
            document.getElementById("numPremises").querySelector("span").textContent = "0";
            document.getElementById("conclusionComplexity").querySelector("span").textContent = "N/A";
            document.getElementById("inferenceSteps").querySelector("span").textContent = "0";
            document.getElementById("rulesUsed").textContent = "N/A";
            document.getElementById("assumptions").style.display = 'none';</p>
<p>            document.getElementById("premisesError").textContent = "";
            document.getElementById("conclusionError").textContent = "";
            document.getElementById("premisesError").style.display = 'none';
            document.getElementById("conclusionError").style.display = 'none';</p>
<p>            logicTableBody.innerHTML = "";
            proofSteps = [];
            chartData.labels = [];
            chartData.datasets = [];
            if (chartInstance) {
                chartInstance.destroy();
                chartInstance = null;
            }
        }</p>
<p>        function copyResults() {
            var resultText = "Logic Proof Verification Results:\n\n";
            resultText += "Premises:\n" + document.getElementById("premises").value + "\n\n";
            resultText += "Conclusion: " + document.getElementById("conclusion").value + "\n\n";
            resultText += "Result: " + document.getElementById("mainResult").textContent + "\n";
            resultText += "Number of Premises: " + document.getElementById("numPremises").querySelector("span").textContent + "\n";
            resultText += "Conclusion Complexity: " + document.getElementById("conclusionComplexity").querySelector("span").textContent + "\n";
            resultText += "Inferred Steps: " + document.getElementById("inferenceSteps").querySelector("span").textContent + "\n";</p>
<p>            var rules = document.getElementById("rulesUsed").textContent;
            if (rules !== "N/A") {
                resultText += "Key Assumptions/Rules Used: " + rules + "\n";
            }</p>
<p>            resultText += "\nStep-by-Step Proof:\n";
            var rows = logicTableBody.querySelectorAll("tr");
            rows.forEach(function(row) {
                var cells = row.querySelectorAll("td");
                resultText += cells[0].textContent + ". " + cells[1].textContent + "\t(" + cells[2].textContent + ")\n";
            });</p>
<p>            // Use a temporary textarea to copy text
            var tempTextarea = document.createElement("textarea");
            tempTextarea.value = resultText;
            tempTextarea.style.position = "fixed"; // Avoid scrolling to bottom of page
            tempTextarea.style.top = "0";
            tempTextarea.style.left = "0";
            tempTextarea.style.opacity = "0";
            document.body.appendChild(tempTextarea);
            tempTextarea.focus();
            tempTextarea.select();</p>
<p>            try {
                var successful = document.execCommand('copy');
                var msg = successful ? 'Results copied to clipboard!' : 'Copying failed.';
                // Optionally show a temporary notification
                console.log(msg); 
            } catch (err) {
                console.log('Unable to copy results.', err);
            }</p>
<p>            document.body.removeChild(tempTextarea);
        }</p>
<p>        // --- Chart Logic ---
        function initChart() {
            var ctx = document.getElementById("proofChart").getContext("2d");
            chartInstance = new Chart(ctx, {
                type: 'line',
                data: chartData,
                options: {
                    responsive: true,
                    maintainAspectRatio: false,
                    scales: {
                        y: {
                            beginAtZero: true,
                            title: {
                                display: true,
                                text: 'Statement Complexity'
                            }
                        },
                         x: {
                            title: {
                                display: true,
                                text: 'Proof Step'
                            }
                        }
                    },
                    plugins: {
                        title: {
                            display: true,
                            text: 'Proof Complexity Over Steps'
                        }
                    }
                }
            });
        }</p>
<p>        function updateChart() {
            if (!chartInstance) {
                initChart();
            }
            chartInstance.data.labels = chartData.labels;
            chartInstance.data.datasets = [{
                label: 'Statement Complexity',
                data: chartData.datasets.length > 0 ? chartData.datasets[0].data : [],
                borderColor: 'rgb(75, 192, 192)',
                tension: 0.1,
                fill: false
            }];
            chartInstance.update();
        }</p>
<p>        // --- FAQ Toggle ---
        function toggleFaq(element) {
            var answer = element.nextElementSibling;
            if (answer.style.display === "block") {
                answer.style.display = "none";
            } else {
                answer.style.display = "block";
            }
        }</p>
<p>        // --- Initial Setup ---
        document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", function() {
            resetCalculator(); // Set default values and clear state
             // Initialize chart after content is loaded
            initChart();
        });</p>
<p>    </script><br />
</body><br />
</html></p>
		</div>

</article>

</div>

<div class="ct-comments" id="comments">
	
	
	
	
		<div id="respond" class="comment-respond">
		<h2 id="reply-title" class="comment-reply-title">Leave a Reply<span class="ct-cancel-reply"><a rel="nofollow" id="cancel-comment-reply-link" href="/logic-proof-calculator-with-steps/#respond" style="display:none;">Cancel Reply</a></span></h2><form action="https://cal81.calculator.city/wp-comments-post.php" method="post" id="commentform" class="comment-form has-website-field has-labels-inside"><p class="comment-notes"><span id="email-notes">Your email address will not be published.</span> <span class="required-field-message">Required fields are marked <span class="required">*</span></span></p><p class="comment-form-field-input-author">
			<label for="author">Name <b class="required"> *</b></label>
			<input id="author" name="author" type="text" value="" size="30" required='required'>
			</p>
<p class="comment-form-field-input-email">
				<label for="email">Email <b class="required"> *</b></label>
				<input id="email" name="email" type="text" value="" size="30" required='required'>
			</p>
<p class="comment-form-field-input-url">
				<label for="url">Website</label>
				<input id="url" name="url" type="text" value="" size="30">
				</p>

<p class="comment-form-field-textarea">
			<label for="comment">Add Comment<b class="required"> *</b></label>
			<textarea id="comment" name="comment" cols="45" rows="8" required="required">